ITR Integrity Assessment in pDNA using qPCR for AAV Gene Therapy Programs in Philadelphia

PROVEN INTELLIGENCE ACCELERATING NEXT-GENERATION THERAPIES

ITR Integrity Assessment in pDNA using qPCR for AAV Gene Therapy Programs in Philadelphia

ITR Integrity Assessment for AAV Plasmid DNA

CELL & GENE | RNA | BIOLOGICS

Executive Summary

The structural integrity of inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) in plasmid DNA is a primary determinant of recombinant AAV vector yield and quality. Due to their palindromic nature, ITRs are susceptible to recombination and deletion during plasmid amplification in E. coli, which directly compromises the production of full, functional viral genomes. We employ a quantitative PCR (qPCR) based assay to rapidly determine the percentage of plasmids with intact ITRs, providing a key quality control metric that de-risks downstream manufacturing and strengthens the CMC data package for AAV programs.


A female scientist in a lab coat analyzes complex biological data, including cellular imagery and DNA models, on a computer screen.

Frequently Asked Questions

    What is ITR integrity and why does it matter for AAV production?

    ITR integrity refers to the complete, unaltered sequence of the inverted terminal repeats in the AAV plasmid. These sequences are required for viral genome replication and packaging into the AAV capsid. Deletions or rearrangements in the ITRs result in truncated genomes that cannot be packaged, leading to lower titers of functional, full vectors and a higher percentage of empty capsids.

    How does qPCR assess ITR integrity?

    The assay uses multiple primer-probe sets that target different regions of the plasmid: one within the ITR sequence and a reference set in a stable region, such as the antibiotic resistance gene. By comparing the quantification cycle (Cq) values between the ITR and the stable reference, we can calculate the percentage of plasmids in a population that retain the intact ITR sequence.

    What is an acceptable ITR integrity percentage for pDNA?

    While program-specific, a high percentage of ITR integrity is a key indicator of a high-quality plasmid preparation. Preparations with significant ITR degradation often correlate with reductions in vector yield and are typically not recommended for large-scale production runs.

    How does this assessment fit into a larger CMC strategy?

    ITR integrity assessment is a standard in-process control for plasmid manufacturing. The data provides an early, predictive indicator of manufacturing suitability, preventing the use of suboptimal starting materials in costly, large-scale AAV production. It is a key data point in the CMC section of an IND submission, demonstrating control over raw materials.


The quality of plasmid DNA used for transfection is a primary variable in AAV manufacturing. While parameters like purity and concentration are standard release criteria, the structural integrity of the ITRs represents a more nuanced and impactful attribute. The inherent instability of these palindromic sequences during amplification presents a significant manufacturing risk, directly affecting the yield of packageable viral genomes.

A senior scientist with grey hair is mentoring a diverse group of younger scientists or students in a laboratory setting.

The CMC Challenge of ITR Recombination

During propagation in standard bacterial strains, ITR sequences are prone to homologous recombination, leading to deletions and rearrangements. This results in a heterogeneous plasmid population where a fraction of the DNA lacks the complete sequences necessary for replication and packaging. Using such a population for AAV production has two negative consequences:

  • Reduced Functional Titer: Only plasmids with two intact ITRs can generate a genome that is efficiently packaged. A compromised plasmid lot directly reduces the output of full, transgene-expressing vectors.

  • Process Inefficiency: The manufacturing process proceeds regardless of plasmid quality, consuming expensive reagents and capacity to produce a higher ratio of empty or partially filled capsids, complicating downstream purification.

Featured Video: Vector Ready: Where AAV projects begin and how they succeed

This webinar covers important factors for initiating AAV vector programs, focusing on capsid engineering, scalability, and preclinical safety profiling.

Learn More & Watch Full Webinar

qPCR as a Quantitative Solution

To mitigate this risk, a quantitative assessment of ITR integrity is a necessary quality control step. Compared to older, semi-quantitative methods like Sanger sequencing or restriction enzyme digests, a qPCR-based assay offers superior speed, sensitivity, and throughput. This method provides a clear percentage of intact molecules, enabling data-driven decisions on which plasmid lots are suitable for advancing into large-scale production.

This level of analytical rigor for starting materials is consistent with a broader strategy of controlling for factors that can influence in vivo outcomes. Research has shown that components within a vector preparation can activate innate immune pathways, such as those involving Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9), potentially triggering adaptive immune responses against the transgene product and reducing long-term expression (PMID: 31703913). Ensuring the highest purity and integrity of the starting plasmid DNA is a fundamental step in minimizing variables that could contribute to unwanted immunogenicity. A well-characterized product is better positioned to achieve sustained efficacy, a principle demonstrated in studies showing how managing the host immune response is key to enabling robust transgene expression (PMID: 26022732).

Our process integrates this assessment as a standard release test for all research and GxP-grade plasmid preparations, ensuring that every AAV production run at our >100,000 sq ft Philadelphia facility begins with well-characterized, high-quality starting material. This analytical oversight is part of the framework that has supported our clients in achieving their IND milestones.

“We started collaborating with UPenn Vector core in 2023 and the AAV vector which they manufactured laid a foundation for development of a gene therapy candidate which will enter soon preclinical studies. The key people from UPenn Vector Core joined Franklin Biolabs and our partnership transitioned without interruption… Franklin Biolabs is an essential collaborator in our AAV-vector based gene therapy candidate development, and we hope to continue the partnership for years to come.”
– Biotech Partner

By identifying and rejecting suboptimal plasmid lots early, we protect project timelines and budgets, contributing to a more predictable path toward the clinic.

A senior scientist leads a discussion with a group of diverse junior scientists in a bright, modern laboratory setting.

Technical Visualization: Plasmid DNA Quality Control Workflow

Scientific Process Diagram

This content is for informational purposes. For guidance specific to your therapeutic program, please contact our team for a consultation.