Franklin Biolabs CEO Selected as a 2026 Women of Influence by the Philadelphia Business Journal
Learn more
Programmatic Asset
PROVEN INTELLIGENCE IN GENE EDITING ANALYTICS.
Programmatic Asset
Quantifying On-Target Editing for CRISPR-Cas9 Therapeutics
CELL & GENE | RNA | BIOLOGICS
Executive Summary
For CRISPR-Cas9 based therapeutics, demonstrating precise on-target editing is a foundational component of any successful IND submission. Moving beyond simple sequence verification requires the development of quantitative, mechanism-of-action (MoA) reflective cell-based assays. These assays provide definitive evidence of the intended biological consequence of the gene edit, directly measuring functional protein restoration or transcript modification. A robust analytical strategy for quantifying potency is a foundational requirement for minimizing clinical risk and aligning with global regulatory expectations.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: What are the primary expectations for potency assays in CRISPR-based IND submissions?
Regulatory bodies expect potency assays to be quantitative and reflective of the therapeutic’s intended mechanism of action. For CRISPR-Cas9 systems, this means the assay must measure the functional outcome of the gene edit, such as the restoration of a target protein or the functional knockdown of a transcript, not just the presence of an indel at the DNA level. These assays must be developed within a phase-appropriate GxP framework.
Q: How do you differentiate between on-target editing efficiency and off-target events in a regulatory submission?
A comprehensive analytical package is required. On-target editing efficiency is quantified using methods like next-generation sequencing (NGS) to determine the percentage of modified alleles. This is complemented by cell-based functional assays to measure the biological consequence. Off-target analysis involves a combination of in silico prediction models and empirical methods like GUIDE-seq or CIRCLE-seq to identify and quantify potential unintended edits across the genome.
Q: Are standard molecular methods like qPCR or ddPCR sufficient for quantifying gene editing outcomes for CMC?
While qPCR and ddPCR are valuable for measuring changes in transcript levels, they do not typically suffice as a standalone potency assay for a CRISPR therapeutic. They form one part of the analytical evidence but must be paired with assays that confirm a change in functional protein levels or a downstream biological activity that is directly linked to the therapeutic effect.
Transitioning from Edit Confirmation to Functional Quantification
Confirmation of a successful gene edit at the DNA level is an initial data point, but it is insufficient for an IND filing without functional quantification. The central challenge is to develop and validate assays that quantitatively measure the intended biological effect of that edit. A scientifically rigorous preclinical strategy must be tailored to the asset’s specific modality and target indication, linking the molecular event to a functional, measurable outcome.
This principle is demonstrated in therapeutic approaches for conditions like Angelman syndrome. The strategic goal is to prove that the molecular intervention functionally unsilences the paternal allele and restores protein expression in the correct neuronal populations (PMID: 33411694). This focus on translational impact, which moves beyond confirming an edit to an antisense transcript, defines a program’s readiness for clinical evaluation.
Core Methodologies for Cell-Based Potency Assays
A multi-faceted approach is required to build a comprehensive data package that characterizes the potency of a CRISPR-Cas9 therapeutic. The selection of methods is dictated by the specific mechanism of action.
-
Flow Cytometry: Provides quantitative, single-cell resolution data on target protein expression, ideal for therapies designed to restore a cell-surface or intracellular protein.
-
ELISA / Western Blot: Measures changes in total protein levels in cell lysates or secreted proteins in culture media, offering a direct assessment of functional protein restoration.
-
Reporter Gene Assays: Can be engineered to measure the activity of a specific pathway that is modulated by the gene editing event.
-
Enzyme Activity Assays: For therapies targeting enzymes, direct measurement of substrate turnover provides a highly relevant functional readout.
These clinical-grade assay development activities are conducted within our extensive >100,000 sq ft facility
, ensuring that analytical development and preclinical testing occur in a coordinated environment.
A Data-Driven Path to IND
The data generated from these quantitative cell-based assays forms a central component of the CMC section of an IND. When combined with robust analytics for gRNA specificity and comprehensive off-target analysis, this package provides regulators with a clear understanding of the therapeutic’s activity and specificity. This integrated approach to analytics is a key factor in the 100% successful IND rate achieved by our core scientific leadership since 2019, a track record established prior to the formal launch of Franklin Biolabs in 2024.
Our focus is on creating a direct, data-driven line from vector analytics to a successful regulatory submission, accelerating typical timelines to get candidates to IND in 18-24 months. For more information on our comprehensive analytical capabilities, please see our core Vector | CMC | Analytics Services offerings.
Featured Video: Franklin BioLab Facility Tour
This site tour showcases Franklin Biolabs’ preclinical and bioanalytical facilities, spanning >100k sq ft of animal housing and specialized laboratory space.
This content is for informational purposes. For guidance specific to your therapeutic program, please contact our team for a consultation.